Terrorism. Lawfulness of detention. Right to liberty and security. Violation of arts. 5 and 6 ECHR.
Normative references
Art. 5 ECHR
Art. 6 ECHR
Ruling
1. The applicant was arrested because he was suspected to have participated in a terrorist attack in Odessa without a previous decision of an independent authority. Moreover, his arrest report was made available with delay. This amounts to a violation of art. 5 ECHR.
2. There has been a violation of the presumption of innocence (protected by art. 6 ECHR) because, before a final judgment, the arrest report expressed the opinion that the defendant was guilty.
Cookies
This site uses technical, analytics and third-party cookies. If you want to learn more or opt out of all or some cookies, press the "Manage cookies" button or consult the
Cookie policy