Competitive pluralism in the media sector. The principles of freedom of expression and freedom of enterprise in the allocation of a tender procedure. State interference and responsibility in preventing arbitrary allocation.
Normative references
Art. 10 ECHR
Ruling
128. In light of the above considerations, the Court concludes that the legislative and administrative framework governing the allocation of digital terrestrial frequencies was not foreseeable and did not provide adequate safeguards against arbitrariness, as required by the rule of law in a democratic society.
Cookies
This site uses technical, analytics and third-party cookies. If you want to learn more or opt out of all or some cookies, press the "Manage cookies" button or consult the
Cookie policy