1. The Court reaffirmed, as already noted in Tănase v. Moldova, that there is a consensus among the Contracting States that the possession of more than one nationality should not be a ground of ineligibility for an individual to be a Member of Parliament. That being said, different approaches could be justified if there are particular historical or political considerations that necessitate a more restrictive practice on the right to stand for election.
2. In the present case, the prohibition to stand for election for persons with dual nationality was formulated in absolute terms; the reason given in general terms was that such citizens might pose a threat to national security and independence.
(The applicant, who was both a Russian and a British citizen, after having been a candidate for the Yaroslavl Regional Duma in the ranks of an opposition party, had his registration cancelled by the Regional Court on the grounds that he held dual nationality).
This site uses technical, analytics and third-party cookies. If you want to learn more or opt out of all or some cookies, press the "Manage cookies" button or consult the
Cookie policy